When an unmarried couple separates, the partner who doesn’t own the property may wonder if they have any claim, especially if the property is solely in the other partner’s name....
Read more
When a couple separates or gets divorced, one of the more emotional and complicated issues can be what happens to their pets. While pets are often considered beloved family members, under UK law, they are viewed as property, not as individuals with legal rights. This can make decisions about residence and care quite tricky. Here’s what you need to know if you're going through a divorce and have pets involved.
Pets as Property
In the eyes of UK law, pets are seen as property, which means that when a couple splits, the pets are treated like any other possession, such as furniture or a car. This means that a court doesn’t typically decide who gets the pet based on emotional attachment but rather on who owns the pet or who is best placed to care for them.
Who Owns the Pet?
The first thing to consider is who legally owns the pet. If one partner purchased the pet, and it is in their name, they are usually seen as the pet’s owner. However, ownership can be less clear if the pet was acquired during the marriage. In such cases, it’s often down to who pays for vet bills and who is responsible for the pet’s daily care.
Reaching an Agreement
In many cases, separating couples can agree on who will keep the pet, which can be included in their divorce settlement. If both parties want the pet, they may need to negotiate, possibly through mediation, to reach a decision. It’s important to be reasonable and consider the pet’s welfare when deciding who will care for it in the long term.
No Contact Arrangements for Pets
Unlike children, pets are not subject to contact arrangements. This means that there is no legal framework for caring for them. The pet will typically stay with one person, and the other partner will not have regular, formal access.
If one partner is particularly attached to the pet and wants to maintain a relationship, they would need to negotiate directly with their ex-partner, but the courts do not usually oversee this. Instead, any ongoing contact is typically dependent on the goodwill of both parties involved.
Pets and Children
If you have children, a pet may be seen as part of the family, and the children’s attachment to the animal could be a factor in the decision. Courts may consider where the children will be living and who will be their primary carer when deciding who should look after the pet. However, pets will not be treated the same way as children in child arrangement cases, and decisions are often based on the practicalities of the situation.
Financial Costs and Care
Another important issue to consider is the financial aspect of pet ownership. Pets can be expensive to care for, with costs for food, veterinary care, and insurance. In a divorce, the financial responsibilities for a pet may be divided between the partners, or one person may take on the full cost. It’s crucial to be clear about who will bear these expenses post-divorce.
What Happens if You Can't Agree?
If you and your ex-partner cannot agree on who should have the pet, and it cannot be resolved through negotiation or mediation, the court may have to step in. In such cases, the court will not make a decision based on emotional attachment but will look at who has ownership and responsibility for the animal.
In extreme cases where there are allegations of mistreatment or neglect, the court may consider the pet’s welfare, but this is less common.
The Bottom Line
Dealing with pets during a divorce can be difficult and emotional, but it’s important to approach the situation carefully and try to come to an agreement. Mediation or legal advice can help ensure that a fair and practical solution is reached, keeping the pet's welfare in mind while also considering both parties’ rights and responsibilities. However, it’s important to note that there are no formal contact arrangements for pets, and the issue of who cares for them is typically resolved between the partners themselves.